Teacher Respect Argument

The United States today suffers greatly from a problem of enormous proportions, a problem rapidly disappearing in other countries in the world such as Japan, Finland, and Canada. This scourge not only puts many of the businesses and fields of today at risk, but also puts the American people at risk. This virulent epidemic is more of a deficiency but can still be deadly; I am discussing the lack of respect for teachers. While many experts all over the U.S. have given their two-cents on how to reverse this calamity, the view that I agreed with the most would have to be that of Zeke Vanderhoek, explaining his process to draw more talented teachers into the profession and keep them there for longer. Probably the one aspect of Vanderhoek's plan that would produce the greatest impact on societies views of teachers would be to pay teachers accordingly to the work that they accomplish. Today's society focuses more on money than just about every other aspect of a job before either pursuing the field or passing judgement on it. Doctors and lawyers receive more admiration from most Americans than teachers receive; One must then look at the salaries of the two fields compared, with the starting salary of a doctor and lawyer(the professionals in this case) being at least $100,000 per year, and with a teacher's being around $20,000-25,000. One of Vanderhoek's methods of raising a salary to a more appropriate level would be to limit the number of administrative employees in the school buildings to the few who are absolutely essential to the running of the school. This frees more money in the school's budget to give teachers a raise and reward them for good work. By allowing teachers to earn more money over time, a much greater number of students will desire to become to teachers, in turn increasing the likelihood of their actually being teachers present to teach the next generations of professionals. Without teachers to teach, the professionals will not possess the skills required for them to do their jobs properly and therefore can not make the salaries that they currently make. Professionals may be better trained than the teachers who teach them (and will also make a far greater amount of money over their lifetime), but the professionals can not get to this point unless they first learn the skills that are necessities for their fields; These skills, believe it or not, are taught by teachers, and without the teachers, the great number of professionals in the field today will soon dwindle to close to none, leaving America between a rock and a hard place. By increasing the pay of teachers, many teachers may also attempt to pursue higher education other than the basic requirement courses that are needed to teach at schools, therefore allowing a teacher, albeit one who knows their subject matter thoroughly, to plan lessons to keep students engaged and interested longer than they would be by just using a book and the school boards cookie-cutter lesson plans. The teachers that are creative and teach in different ways are often the most challenging teachers to pass a class from, but are also the favorite teachers among the students and often gain the respect and admiration that most teachers lack. While there are those who challenge this theory, bringing up arguments such as paying teachers better can detract from the overall functionality of the school as whole, with the money used to pay the new salaries restricting the ability for necessary resources of the school from being obtained, and also the argument that teachers will not teach better whether they make a larger salary or not. These arguments are completely valid, unfortunately in some situations quite true, but overall this will not be the case. With higher pay more people will want to become teachers, making the demand for teachers increase, allowing only the best of the best to become teachers, driving prospective teachers to gain as much education as they can to be selected for the jobs. This will increase the overall ability for teachers to teach their students, greatly improving their learning ability and their standardized test scores, which then results in more government funding for the school to continue operating efficiently and to continue teaching the students. So, whatever money is lost when the schools begin paying teachers with a higher salary will more than likely be gained back in the long run. While the plans look fantastic on paper and seem like such an easy solution, reality jumps to the forefront and shows the long, arduous road. Like life threatening illnesses, their is no simple, fix-all cure to eliminate all signs of the plague and destroy the source and immunize people. The process will take time and cooperation to fix the growing problem involving teachers. Let's all hope that the impossible can be accomplished.

The Great Gatsby analysis

Fitzgerald's elusive, hopeless view of society and mankind reveals the struggles that the world undergoes to move forward and provide changes to the world, but also the inability to remain enthralled with unspoiled world around them, often ending in a worse situation in which they began.

In Fitzgerald's view of the shore, he notes the "inessential houses," and watches the "shadowy, moving glow" of the ferries on the river, all the while contemplating the "vast obscurity beyond the city." He uses language that gives a sense of transparency and an unrealistic tint to the objects that society has deemed necessary and essential for life, spinning the objects as mere illusions, detracting from the actually view of the world- the area "beyond the city", where society has not obtained and improved. Fitzgerald offers these thoughts as an explanation to the faults of society- namely the need to alter and change and buy "stuff"- that was very prevalent in the 1920s and continuing today, with our consumerism culture leaving all who participate with an unfulfilled sensation, showing how everything that we attempt to use to change the world is not fully the answer, how it is the ghost of what we truly want to do in the world.

Fitzgerald also discusses the short attention span of society, with "man...face to face for the last time something to commensurate to his capacity to wonder," with man always trying to "run faster, stretch out our arms farther" to something new, while the dream-what man actually wants- "was already behind him." These phrases give an unreachable sound, like the dream is always one step ahead and can not be attained, or so we think; Often times society places more interest on certain goals that we think we must have, when the actual goal may have already passed by, and we did not reach out to grasp it. By showing humanities lack of interest in the vast wonders of untainted society, the author demonstrates how society is always running for the newest object, like culture today, with new products being unveiled constantly, never to be satisfied with what they have-ultimately leading to a downward spiral back to the original and the past.

Fitzgerald paints a bleak picture of a world riddled by consumerism and dissatisfaction with the world surrounding them. If this general trend continues, the entire system may implode in on itself, and history will repeat itself; maybe not a situation as serious as the Great Depression, but before long, society will return to the unspoiled pleasures of the world. Once society terminates the habit of chasing after the manifestations of dreams, the world will right itself and recover the lost ground caused by the consumerist trends plaguing our nation.

Forster view screencast

http://www.screencast-o-matic.com/watch/cXeh3P2bh

Quotes on Consumerism

In society today, not a soul seems to be content with their current possessions. The general rule for this generation seems to be, "Give me this! Give me this! Give me this! Now I want that instead because that is newer!" Has anyone ever stopped to think about how maybe, just maybe, if we curtailed our spending habits, the entire infrastructure of the world economy may right itself?



Well my friends, as always, the answer to this minuscule problem is in the Bible, Proverbs 30: 8-9 to be exact. The very first line of this passage starts out with "Give me neither poverty nor riches/ Grant me only my share of bread to eat," which emphasizes the problems today. No one wants just their share; society screams to people to take their share, more than they can carry, and then some more. The reason a share is called a "share" is because that is the part that will allow the receiver to accomplish whatever needs to be done, be the task feeding a family or paying bills. Similar to the family in "But Will it Make You Happy," this passage tells the reader to live with only the bare essentials (the "share"), and more than likely you will become happier, most likely due to a simplification of finances, like the family in the article, who removed all of the items that were not absolutely necessary and became debt free. Also, by limiting possessions to only the most important and essential, a strong emotional attachment can develop to the items, making the owner less likely to trade in or buy a new product just because the product is newer.

The next line of the quote states, " for fear that surrounded by plenty, I should fall away/
and say, "Yahweh - who is Yahweh?"/ or else in destitution, take to stealing/ and profane the name of my God." These lines are fairly straight forward, meaning that a person surrounded by plenty will forget where the riches they possessed came from, and will forget about God. No matter what all of the disaster theorists say about why the world is falling apart, this is more than likely the reason. As the world began to prosper, fewer and fewer people kept going to church, until the percentage of Americans who actually regularly attend church is lower than it has been in over thirty years. And this economic downturn is a good indication of what this drop has caused. This entire economic situation may be a result of America- who was founded on Christian principles- "falling away from and profaning" God. This situation reminds me of a parent knowing their child is doing wrong and waiting for them to admit they did wrong and to come back, and, even more like the parent, eventually having to come and reprimand the child because they will not return willingly. This situation leaves a grim outlook for the future, with a new disaster on the horizon if the problem continues unchecked.

Well, this is my analysis for this consumerism quote. Hopefully the world can right itself before the rest of the economy comes crashing down around our society's ears.

3rd Quarter Annotated Reading List

I read 3 books, the equivalent of 7 books.

• Treasure Island- Robert L. Stevenson (134 pages)
• Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone- J.K. Rowling (309 pages)
• Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets- J.K. Rowling (341 pages)

Stevenson, Robert L. Treasure Island. Racine, WI: Western, 1971. Print. (3 books)
Treasure Island tells the story of a young boy named Jim, whose encounter with pirates starts him on a quest for a legendary treasure, amassed by a notorious pirate named Captain Flint. After a group of parents attack the inn owned by Jim's parents, he discovers that they were after a map showing the location of Treasure Island; after sharing this information with the Doctor and the Squire, they decide to form an expedition team to travel to Treasure Island. The trip seems to be proceeding without a hitch, until Jim discovers a secret plot among the crew to mutiny and keep the treasure for themselves. With this revelation, Jim and the remaining, non-mutinous crew take flight to the island and set up defenses against the pirates, and also discovering a mysterious man with a secret that will change their views of the island.
One aspect that drew me to this book was the content. The book is full to the brim with all of the pirate cliches that have been in every pirate movie since the publication of this book (Pirates of the Carribean being just one example). References to the Dead Man's Chest, outlining the proper way to maroon a friend on a deserted island, and half-way explaining why pirates must have large amounts of rum present at all times (they just seem to prefer rum to every otherbeverage) are just a few of the topics revealed in the book. Plus, I have always enjoyed a good pirate story, with mutinies and songs and fights with muskets, showing how even pirates know how to create a fun and rewarding cruise vacation to a dangerous, treasure filled island.

Rowling, J. K. Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone. New York: Scholastic, 1999. Print. (309 pages)


Rowling, J. K. Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets. New York: Scholastic, 2000. Print. (341 pages)

Advertising Techniques of the Future

With the economy currently struggling, many Americans no longer have the money to go out to Wal-mart and buy whatever new item just came out, be it a new iPod or 3D Television or any other product. Many families just like this family are discovering that simpler pleasures can be just as, and maybe more so, satisfying than buying that new television and sitting in front of the screen for hours on end. I'm talking about family game nights.

Many of the board game companies, including Hasbro, are trying to market their products toward a more family-oriented direction. The ad features a family of four at different points in the day repeatedly saying, "It's Wednesday," before showing the mom at a store, possibly Wal-mart or Target, buying a board game for her family. The family then are seen playing the game at their house that night and having an almost gratuitous amount of fun. This commercial really emphasized the fact that a family can have fun together, even with a bad economy, and with all of the technology available to all people.

This commercial really hit home with me, causing me to remember all of the family game nights I have had with my parents over the years. Maybe I am not a normal teenager, but I actually like my parents and it does not bother me to spend time with them. The general truth seems to be that, with all of this new technology in the world, people (especially teenagers,myself included) began to become more and more anti-social, but, because times are getting tougher and people have less money, they seem to realize that they don't need new expensive toys to have fun- they need a group of people they want to be around.

With these new advertising schemes from the myriad of companies releasing new products, a shift seems to be occurring, from buying the new products and not being with your family as much, because all of the new "stuff" eats up all the time you have, to a more family-centric way of living, with the most important goal being spending time with family. Hopefully, with this shift, all of the innumerable problems in the world can be improved or even solved. But, if not, then I guess all Americans can just try to remember their family game nights and sigh contentedly at their reminiscences.

One and the Same

"Well, Christmas is upon us once again", as the great Charlie Brown once said. That also means that everyone is playing Christmas music everywhere, in the stores, in the streets, in homes, everywhere. One song and video in particular stood out to me: David Bowie and Bing Crosby singing a medley of "Little Drummer Boy" and "Peace on Earth." It is quite obvious why this performance stood out to me, just from the names of the performers, but the entire pretense of the song houses a deeper meaning than just the fact two legends are performing a song together.

Bing Crosby made his fame in the thirties and forties with his music known today as big band music or as a "crooner," with songs such as "White Christmas," "Baby, It's Cold Outside," and "Danny Boy," while David Bowie made his fame as a glam rocker in the seventies and eighties, with songs such as "Suffragette City," "Let's Dance," and "Heroes," basically the parallel opposite of Crosby. What makes this performance so interesting lies within the mutual respect that the two singers have for each other, despite one being old and the other being relatively modern. Despite the age differences, the singers represented popular music at their time in the world, and even though they may have different mediums to their music, both singers are more alike than most people could see from their music.

By the singers coming together and collaborating, they showed how, even with vast differences, people can come together and work together and respect each other. Now, I don't want to come off as one of those crazy people saying, "no more trouble, no more wars, love for everyone," because that probably is not possible, but this performance showed how different age groups, or countries, or ethnicities can come together and work with each other. The way that Bing Crosby and David Bowie blend the Christmas standards using their characteristic voices unveils the songs in a new, slightly contradictory light, almost like, "What is this? I don't know how to explain the sounds I am hearing!" But maybe this fact is why the song has endured over the years.

The symbolic meaning of the performance gives anyone who watches the video or hears the song a feeling of hope that one day the world will get over themselves and work together. Wait, I just found another of the meanings of Christmas; Bring on the holiday special.